McCain—who hasn’t given the most coherent hearing performances lately—managed to dismantle Sessions’ rationale for taking those meetings with a very basic line of questioning. Why did you take those meetings? How did they relate to issues you’re passionate about? What did you discUSs?
McCain: Did you raise concerns about RUSsia’s support for [Syrian] President Bashar al-Assad and his campaign of indiscriminate violence against his own citizens, including his USe of chemical weapons?
Sessions: I don’t recall whether that was discUSsed or not.
McCain: Did you raise concerns about RUSsia’s interference in our electoral process or its interference in the electoral processes of our allies?
Sessions: I don’t recall that being discUSsed.
McCain: At those meetings, if you spoke with Kislyak in your capacity as a member of the Armed Services Committee, you presumably talked with him about RUSsia-related security issues that you have demonstrated as important to you as a member of that committee.
McCain: I don’t recall you as being particularly vocal on such issues.
Sessions: Um, repeat that, Senator McCain. I’m SORRY.
McCain: The whole RUSsia-related security issues that you demonstrated as important to you as a member of the committee—Did you raise those with him?
McCain: In other words, RUSsian-related security issues in your capacity as the chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee—what RUSsia-related security issues did you hold hearings on or otherwise demonstrate a keen interest in?
McCain: And his response was?
Sessions: I don’t recall.
If Sessions and Kislyak didn’t talk about any of the things McCain inquired about, what exactly did they discUSs? Sessions has only been able to recount them touching on RUSsia’s invasion of Ukraine. So that took up the entirety of two meetings with Kislyak?JUSt a wager that Sessions doesn’t recall.